電影觀後感500字英語怎麼說

『壹』 李小龍傳 (Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story）電影英語觀後感大概500字

unlike some people who tend to think that every movie had to be put into such serious seriousness in contrast to real events. the entire purpose of movies is not to be a history book with some strict codes to follow, movies are designed to be entertainment, not a history lesson. people always tell those who take a movie to serious, "its just a movie" well if you think about it thats all it is. since when does a movie say 'the absolute truth on the cover of the film. the answer is never. they may try to capture some of the events but i think despite that there could have been like one member had stated more of his personal reputations for being a doting father, a mystical fighter off the screen, etc. when it comes down to it i think how they captured each scene of combat in a different setting it beats some movies where every fight starts the same way with someone saying something to someone and one of them getting mad. in this case Bruce was never the aggressor but he was always the one who finished the conflict. who cares if he really injured his back in a fight or weightlifting. the film gives you an emotionally intriguing story of how he overcame such an injury whether it was from a fight or from lifting.

aside from my disagreements on how people are so critical about the movies story i have no problems with the story myself. i think this film although like many could have been better i don't think that jet Li could have made this film any better than it was made. this film was made with absolute professionalism on the part of both Jason Scott lee, and Lauren holly. as this movie unfolded i was already interested by the title alone when i first saw the film when i was 8. it soon became my favorite action movie greatly surpassing "blood Sport" which was also a very good movie. that scene at the beginning where some British sailors show up and start harrassing a beautiful woman, you see this person walk up the stairs who walks up behind the leader who was roughing the woman. the guy gets tired of listening to him and he tries to hit him out of the blue but before the next two minutes have gone by he has dropped each one of them. later the same thing happens in a different environment. a woman who was attracted to him had a jealous admirer who started a fight where he and four others with meat cleavers tried to kill him. in the end each one of them goes back inside limping like they had been hit by a tank. while Bruce has merely a cut on his arm. the best fight in this film was this scene. the energy and the first glimpse of how truly masterful the front-man was at his portrayal of the legend Bruce lee. each fight gave you that i have to see it again feeling. combined with possibly the best soundtrack i have heard made for a movie, this film captures emotion, intensity, and every feeling i hope to get from a film. this is the best action film of the last decade. don't tell me that hero was the best action movie you ever saw. i couldn't sit through half let alone the whole film.

the action in hero in comparison to dragon the Bruce lee story was completely without question inferior. i know i am not picky about a historical plot or some half A**ed story line. but i am picky about a good fight scene. hero was a flop because for one you cant fight a battle while running on water, you cant fly 20 feet in the air by bouncing on a tree limb and least of all one thats only about an inch thick. you cant jump in the air and run along the wall and slash your way through a bunch of bundles of anything and not touch the ground. this in contrast to the simply superior martial arts choriography that made dragon such a great film to watch. as far as things go from a simple stand point, dragon the Bruce lee story may not be completely accurate but it more than portrayed the mystical fighting ferocity that made Bruce lee the legend he was. A great film, a fan of Bruce lee or not rent this film and see for yourself.

『貳』 用英語寫電影觀後感

Jenny is always said, forrest, you don't know what love is.
But, I think he is the most know what is love.
Forrest gump love my mom.
Of course, his mother also did indeed is a great mother. She used her whole life to love his son, never because forrest gump intelligence fragmentary and stingy he deserved that love. She let forrest gump have been growing very happy, and because of this, forrest gump can have an immaculate heart.
Mother is this in the world most moved to the words, no matter how big the language differences, mom this two word pronunciation is always the same.
Women are still weak, for mother is strong.
In fact I think, forrest gump's mother is proud of it, she has brought up a so so good son.
jenny總是說，阿甘，你不懂什麼是愛。
可是，我覺得他是最懂得什麼是愛的人。

阿甘愛媽媽。
當然，他的媽媽也確確實實是一位偉大的母親。她用她的整個生命來愛自己的兒子，從不因為阿甘智力上的殘缺而吝嗇他應得的那份愛。她讓阿甘一直成長得很開心，也因為這樣，阿甘才能擁有一顆純潔無瑕的心。
媽媽是這個世界上最讓人動容的詞語，無論語言的差異如何大，媽媽這兩個字的發音永遠是相似的。
女性雖弱，為母則強。
其實我想，阿甘的媽媽是驕傲的吧，她養育了一個那麼那麼好的兒子。

『叄』 急求一片電影觀後感，英文，500字左右

Jane Eyre — A Beautiful Soul（簡愛）
Jane Eyre, is a poor but aspiring, small in body but huge in soul, obscure but self-respecting girl. After we close the covers of the book, after having a long journey of the spirit, Jane Eyre, a marvelous figure, has left us so much to recall and to think:

We remember her goodness: for someone who lost arms and blinded in eyes, for someone who despised her for her ordinariness, and even for someone who had hurt her deeply in the past.

We remember her pursuit of justice. It』s like a companion with the goodness. But still, a virtuous person should promote the goodness on one side and must check the badness on the other side.

We remember her self-respect and the clear situation on equality. In her opinion, everyone is the same at the God』s feet. Though there are differences in status、in property and also in appearance, but all the human being are equal in personality.

We also remember her striving for life, her toughness and her confidence…

When we think of this girl, what she gave us was not a pretty face or a transcendent temperament that make us admire deeply, but a huge charm of her personality.

Her story makes us thinking about life and we learn much from her experience, at least, that is a fresh new recognition of the real beauty.

『肆』 英語電影觀後感怎麼寫

尋夢環游記觀後感：

The hero of this film is a little boy MiG who wants to be a musician, and hopes that he can create touching music like his idol Drakus, but his family has always forbidden people to touch music.

這部電影的主人公是個小男孩米格一心想成為音樂家，更希望自己能和偶像德拉庫斯一樣，能創造出打動人心的音樂，但他的家族世代卻一直禁止族人接觸音樂。

I thought he would be discouraged, but I didn't expect him to steal the guitar for his dream. But for me, I wanted to be a painter since I was a child. However, because of laziness, I sometimes don't want to learn fine arts.

我本以為他會灰心喪氣，沒想到，他為了自己的夢想，竟然去偷吉他。可我呢，從小就想當一名畫家。可是卻因為懶惰，有時不想去學美術特長。

The film "Journey to the Dream" tells me such a truth: if you have a dream, you must pursue it and make unremitting efforts for it, and you can't give up easily.

《尋夢環游記》這部電影，告訴了我這樣一個道理：有了夢想就要追求，並要為之付出不懈的努力，不能輕言說放棄。

『伍』 英語電影觀後感500字

簡愛 Jane Eyre review by Heather
I was hesitant at first,but now I am truly hooked. As I waited patiently for each hour of more Jane, I grew to admire the way the book was handled. Yes, much of Jane's past is missing, but what is there is captivating. Georgie Henley is scarily mature - more than she has a right to be - and her understanding of young Jane's gravity and passion was wonderfully portrayed.

When Ruth Wilson took the scene, I didn't see at first how she was the unearthly Jane I had read. But it became clearer and clearer, and by far she is the most human and understandable Jane yet. Her face speaks volumes as she says nothing. "That face," comments Toby Stephens' Rochester. It is true. Though we see her silent face many times, we have no problem guessing exactly what she is feeling.

At first, I thought Toby was disappointing. I quite liked the sarcasm of William Hurt in the 1996 version, and Mr. Stephens seemed more brash than sarcastic, more flirting than teasing. But it was the chemistry that quite obviously grew between these two characters that has solidified Toby Stephens as Edward Fairfax Rochester for me. For the first time in a movie version, I realized how much the two had become friends first, and then soul mates.

Two other things were handled extraordinarily. The sex and the scary. From dark corridors and floating candles, burning beds, portraits of mad people and blood dripping, Susanna White got her Gothic right. It is almost a ghost story. This suspense keeps the story from being overly lovey-dovey, and shows a real contrast between the white taffeta-covered aristocracy, and the darkly-clad Jane in Rochester's dim study.

As for the X factor, this is not Jane Austen. Women can have conversations with men alone in rooms. Dark-haired, exotic beauties can sece with a look, cheat with a smile and sin the world round. All of it is not afraid to show up in this version. Rochester and Jane's connection, displayed quite innocently and platonic in some versions, blazes with passion in this. The flashbacks in the final hour of series are some of the steamiest and most emotionally charged parts of this proction.

It's heart-warming, passionate, suspenseful, full of beautiful scenery and costuming; all in all, a whole 4 hours of excellent entertainment. Don't miss out.

『陸』 電影觀後感用英語怎麼說

Movie Review

『柒』 電影《亞瑟王》的英文觀後感，500字左右，不要復制的，自己寫的，加分

Written by David Franzoni (Gladiator) and directed by Antoine Fuqua (Training Day), this film abandons all premonitions of what Arthur was and what he is in all our memories. They do keep some of the same, more recognizable, legends of the king. The Round Table makes an appearance but is not nearly held with as high regard as in previous legends. Also, Excalibur still sits on the hip of Arthur. But there's a different twist here. Where in other legends, Arthur was the son of a poor man who pulled the sword Excalibur from its stone, therefore establishing Divine Right for King of England; here Excalibur is his father's sword. His father is killed in battle and the young Arthur pulls the sword from his father's dead body and carries the sword since. Fuqua decides to use the same imagery as if Arthur was pulling the sword out of a stone but just the idea that Excalibur was pulled from his father's body and he has carried it ever since, establishes a little more depth to the story. And that's where most of the similarities stop. This story is based on historical finds that have been discovered recently that have not been established in other Arthurian literature or film works. Arthur is a Roman that has to serve out his ty to the Roman Empire until he realizes he is fighting for a Rome that is too idealistic to exist. Lancelot is an amazingly gifted warrior who was recruited from a young age to join the conquering Roman army to serve for 15 years. He has more of a friendship with Arthur than a king/knight relationship. Guinevere is not a princess from the neighboring France but an English born slave who is discovered and rescued by Arthur's knights. And Merlin normally considered the lovable magician is more of a rebel ghost who leads a rag tag group of English fighting the Roman Empire. So no, this is not your typical 'Arthur' movie.

But what truly surprised me were not the entirely new interpretations but how well every aspect of the film was done. The cinematography was unbelievable. Most of the shots look like they could have been taken start from artist renderings of Arthurian literature. Breathtaking establishing shots of the snowy English landscape transport you back into 400 AD where nature was virtually untouched and made you wish you could visit this country on holiday. The script for the film was done very well also. There weren't those blockbuster, crappy lines that one would expect from a Bruckheimer film. There wasn't even the one liner, 'Braveheart-like' war anthem when going into battle but a very stirring speech from Clive Owen (Arthur) that made you think 'They better kick some Saxon ass.' And it was funny. Not in the modern way either but they took humor and situations from that era and made it funny to today's audience, a true accomplishment.

But there are two things that make a blockbuster, period piece like this work…the battle scenes and the acting. First off, the acting was very impressive. Fuqua casted relatively unknown actors, besides Owen and Keira Knightly, to play the other pivotal parts in the film. None of the performances seemed forced and all appear to become their characters which was probably easier because they did not have to play the well known characters. These were all new interpretations of Arthur and his knights, allowing them to play the characters as they see fit. Who was impressive though was Knightly. Although I am a fan, I was even more impressed with the way she handled the role of Guinevere. Guinevere is no longer a princess who watches from the background but a warrior of Merlin who contributes greatly to the battles. Not many young, very young (19), actress today can pull off a role where you have to be a gorgeous potential Queen one minute and then a brutal warrior the next. And it was these battle scenes that made the film stand out just that much more. You have to appreciate it when directors and writers try to find new and innovative ways to have a battle scene that isn't two giant armies running at one another, swinging large weapons. 'Arthur' is one of those movies that made you believe these were how battles of that time should have been fought. And they were fun to watch.

All in all, 'King Arthur' amazed me. Very rarely to I walk into a film with such high expectations that they would never be filled. Yea, 'Arthur' surpassed everything I ever imagined.

『捌』 跪求一篇英文電影的英語觀後感，500字左右，初一水平

英語電影英文觀後感《功夫熊貓》(《Kung Fu Panda》)的:
<1>
Funny!
I see this movie lastweek,
So terrfic,this film make me loving Kung Fu!
My liitle sister love the panda very much ,She ask me which kind annimal of Panda?
I told her its one of the cutiest animal in the world ,it only lives in China.
In this movie, Panda learns how to improve his level of Kung fu，many scence show that this cartoon is so funny,
You can see how things goes on with laugh,
I recommend this film to you.!
<2>
The film stars a panda named Po (voice of Jack Black), who is so fat he can barely get out of bed. He works for his father, Mr. Ping (James Hong) in a noodle shop, which features Ping's legendary Secret Ingredient. How Ping, apparently a stork or other billed member of the avian family, fathered a panda is a mystery, not least to Po, but then the movie is filled with a wide variety of creatures who don't much seem to notice their differences.
They live in the beautiful Valley of Peace with an ancient temple towering overhead, up zillions of steps, which the pudgy Po can barely climb. But climb them he does, dragging a noodle wagon, because all the people of the valley have gathered up there to witnethe choosing of the Dragon Warrior, who will engage the dreaded Tai Lung (Ian McShane) in kung-fu combat. Five contenders have been selected, the "Furious Five": Monkey (Jackie Chan), Tigre(Angelina Jolie), Mantis (Seth Rogen), Viper (Lucy Liu) and Crane (David Cross). Tigrelooks like she might be able to do some serious damage, but the others are lethan impressive. Mantis in particular seems to weigh about an ounce, tops. All five have been trained (for nearly forever, I gather) by the wise Shifu, who with Dustin Hoffman's voice is one of the more dimensional characters in a story that doesn't give the others a lot of depth. Anyway, it's up to the temple master Oogway (Randall Duk Kim), an ancient turtle, to make the final selection, and he chooses -- yes, he chooses the hapleand pudgy Po.
The story then becomes essentially a series of action sequences, somewhat undermined by the fact that the combatants seem unable to be hurt, even if they fall from dizzying heights and crack stones open with their heads. There's an extended combat with Tai Lung on a disintegrating suspension bridge (haven't we seen that before?), hand-to-hand-to-tail combat with Po and Tai Lung, and upstaging everything, an energetic competition over a single mpling.
"Kung Fu Panda" is not one of the great recent animated films. The story is way too predictable, and truth to tell, Po himself didn't overwhelm me with his charisma But it's elegantly drawn, the action sequences are packed with energy, and it's short enough that older viewers will be forgiving. For the kids, of course, all this stuff is much of a muchness, and here they go again.